Method
A result you can trace back to its source
Ageing infrastructure decisions are only as good as the chain of evidence behind them. Our method keeps that chain intact, from the first drawing to the engineer's signature.
Numbers come from calculations
Language models help people operate the tools. Every value in a result comes from a calculation step that can be named, rerun and checked.
The engineer stays in the loop
The platforms prepare evidence. They do not approve their own work; a qualified engineer reviews and signs.
Everything is labelled
Measured, derived, provisional and synthetic data are marked as such on every screen, in every report.
Evidence is sealed
Reports ship with an evidence pack and a SHA-256 manifest, so an assessment can be handed over and verified later.
Data stay where they should
Client data are processed in the United Kingdom, used only for the engagement, and can run on a local model that never leaves the machine.
Standards, named
Every check states the standard and clause it rests on, so a reviewer knows what was assumed.
Standards we work to
Reference set
| Basis and actions | EN 1990; EN 1991-1-4 with the UK National Annex |
|---|---|
| Steel structures | EN 1993-1-1; EN 1993-3-1; EN 10025-2; EN 10056-1 |
| Overhead lines | EN 50341-1; BS EN 50341-2-9 |
| Corrosion | ISO 9223; ISO 9224 |
| Information management | ISO 19650 series with the UK National Annex; EN 17412-1; IFC4; COBie; Uniclass 2015 |